How People Choose Has Changed

Why the customer is harder to read than at any point in thirty years — and what the home market is telling us about it.

People still want what they wanted. The way they choose it has changed.

I’ve spent thirty years reading the home market, and the customer has never been harder to read than right now. Spending continues. But the signals that used to tell us a purchase was coming — the enquiry, the return visit, the predictable trade-up — have weakened, all at once. Brands that could once anticipate their customer are now guessing, and most of them know it.

What the trend work keeps showing us

At MC&Co we read the aesthetics of this category for a living: what is being specified, ranged, photographed and bought across interiors, furniture and homewares. Over the past two years the same observations have kept surfacing, in markets that share very little else.

The edited range is outperforming the broad one. Customers are committing to one significant piece and buying carefully around it, instead of buying the coordinated set. Products that show how they were made are selling ahead of products that only say it. Second-hand and vintage keep holding ground that new product expected to win back. And the middle of the market is where the losses keep landing, in every major region at once.

None of this is a secret. Any buyer or designer reading this will have seen most of it on their own floor.

This is not a style story

Styles rotate. Reading the rotation is our trade. What we are looking at now behaves differently. The same signals are appearing at the same time in Northern Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific and Australia — markets that do not share an aesthetic. When that happens, the cause is not taste. It sits underneath taste, in how people are making decisions.

The home is where a change like that shows first. When the wider world feels unmanageable, the home is the one environment a person can still govern. What people buy for it, and how carefully they buy it, is the most honest record we have of how they are coping.

So we went looking

Late last year we set the aesthetic work aside and went underneath it. We read across the published consumer evidence — McKinsey, Euromonitor, NielsenIQ, Bain, Edelman, Ipsos, Accenture, Kantar and the behavioural research beneath them — and kept only the movements that more than one independent body had named on its own. No single-source claims made the cut.

Six shifts survived that filter. Together they cover the full path of a purchase: how people find product now, how they evaluate it, how they justify the spend, and what finally makes them commit or walk away. One of the six is moving faster than anything we have tracked in a decade.

I won’t summarise them here. Each one changes a different part of how a range should be built, and a summary would flatten exactly the detail that makes them useable.

Why this matters now

Every range, buying and specification decision made this year sits on top of these six shifts, whether or not the business making the decision has read them. The brands that understand how their customer now chooses will build ranges that get chosen. The rest are pricing, ranging and marketing to a customer who has already moved.

The report is free

We have set the six shifts out in full in The Six Shifts Shaping Consumer Choice, a free MC&Co report written for interior designers, buyers, product developers and the executives they answer to. It is built from the evidence and readable in twenty minutes. 

Fill in the below form to get it now